Survey on SC/ST Atrocities: The Crimes we never talk about

15 Jun

Media coverage on crime is heavily skewed in favour of reporting urban crime as opposed to rural, or caste-based crime.  Though we occasionally hear reports of honour killings, or entire community households being burnt down, they are reported more as examples of a malaise afflicting society.  This malaise itself is not talked about.  This post captures some recent information on practises against Dalits and atrocities against them.

Open magazine, along with a number of other news papers have carried stories on a report published by a group called the Tamil Nadu Untouchability Eradication Front (“an umbrella group of more than 150 labour, Dalit and human rights movements).  They set off on a comprehensive survey three years ago. They started documenting all manifestations of untouchability,  2010. They visited 1,845 villages in 22 (of 32) districts in the state.  The survey recorded an astonishing 80-odd practices of untouchability—new, bizarre, vintage. It further recorded 22 atrocities committed against Dalits.”

Some of the practices the magazine quotes from the report include:

  1. Not allowed to speak on the cell phone in the presence of caste Hindus. (A practice reported in the Nilgiri constituency, a reserved Lok Sabha seat, the current incumbent of which is, ironically, Union Telecom Minister A Raja.)
  2. Not allowed to keep male dogs. (Why? They might breed with female dogs from upper caste neighbourhoods.)
  3. Separate work timings under the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme.
  4. No door delivery by postmen; postal department prevented from hiring Dalit postmen.
  5. Prevented from having their clothes washed or ironed, or assigned separate cupboards at the laundry for clothes of Dalits.
  6. Offered tea in coconut shells which they can drink only by squatting on the ground.
  7. Attacked if they call any caste Hindu as annan (brother).
  8. Dalit (Arunthathiyar) students compelled to clean bathrooms in schools.
  9. Forced to eat faeces.
  10. Murdered if elected as Panchayat President against the wishes of the dominant caste.
  11. Killing all dogs in a Dalit area if a dog of the Dalit area bites a dog that belongs to an upper caste community.

In the course of my work I have often heard of the Civil Rights Act, 1955, and the Prevention of Atrocities against SCs and STs Act.  I went through the website of the National Crime Records Bureau which would also record statistics on offences under these two laws:

  1. There were a total of 33,615 incidents of crimes being reported against SC’s in 2008.  Almost 25% of this was in Uttar Pradesh.
  2. Under the SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act, more than 35% of cases were still pending investigation at the end of the year.
  3. The total number of cases for trial in courts in India under the SC/ST Act in 2008 was 40,963.  Out of this, 34,014 were still pending in courts at the end of the year.

Though there was a lot of other information available, I put in these three points to highlight how at all three levels starting from the actual occurrence of the incident, investigation by the police, and finally to dispensing justice  in courts, there is an overwhelming picture of the state and society having failed in resolving the issue of caste amicably.

Advertisements

2 Responses to “Survey on SC/ST Atrocities: The Crimes we never talk about”

  1. coffee beans July 9, 2010 at 6:08 am #

    Hi, just wanted to add, that not only would half of these crimes not be registered, they would not fall within a definition of crimes under IPC or other laws, which are too straightjacketed to, for eg., include the prohibition to have door step delivery of post.

    Like

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Do strict laws really help when nobody enforces them? | Polity in India - India as an evolving polity - June 12, 2013

    […] out just one of many instances of extra-constitutional killings being committed by them.  And in another blog post, I had pointed to the high pendency of cases concerning atrocities against SCs and STs under […]

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Bar and Bench

Observations on legal and political developments in India

Firstpost

Observations on legal and political developments in India

Mainstream Weekly

Observations on legal and political developments in India

Scholars without Borders

Observations on legal and political developments in India

Legal Blog

Observations on legal and political developments in India

LAW RESOURCE INDIA

LEGAL RESOURCE CENTRE / COURT JUDGMENTS / LEGAL ARCHIVES

India Together

Observations on legal and political developments in India

Concurring Opinions

Observations on legal and political developments in India

Bar & Bench

Observations on legal and political developments in India

Law and Other Things

Observations on legal and political developments in India

sans serif

the news. the views. the juice.

%d bloggers like this: