Consumer protection or curb on right to speech and expression?

19 Sep

-writing from Harvard Law School

 

There have been recent news reports (though surprisingly few – here and here) on new government regulations that ostensibly seek to protect cell phone users from unwanted marketing calls, but may actually amount to restrictions on individual rights to free speech and expression. The telecom regulator TRAI introduced regulations which will come into effect on September 27, which limit the number of free SMSes a person can send to 100 a day.

The TELECOM COMMERCIAL COMMUNICATIONS CUSTOMER PREFERENCE (SIXTH AMENDMENT) REGULATIONS (read clause 8), 2011 state that call phone service providers cannot permit the sending of more than 100 SMSes a day. For post-paid subscribers, the limit is 3,000 SMSes per month. According to news reports, TRAI’s reason for this regulation is to check “Unsolicited Commercial Communications”. While this may reduce the number of marketing messages being received by irate cell-phone users, the larger ramifications of this regulation directly affects the freedom of individuals to send as many messages a person wants.

One direct effect of this regulation is on the competition between service providers and the benefit to cell-phone users: If Airtel can provide more free messages to its consumers than Vodafone or vice-versa, it means the two will compete to provide cheaper and cheaper services for free SMSes to consumers. In the end, consumers benefit.  Putting a blanket limit on free SMSes ensures that the cell phone companies now don’t have to compete to provide cheaper services. Net result: consumers lose.

More importantly, this affects how individuals communicate with others in society. In this respect, it is similar to saying, person A cannot speak more than 1,000 words a day, or person B cannot put up more than 3 blog posts or 5 Facebook updates a day. Granted these are extreme examples, but the effect of these regulations is similar. And why a 100 SMSes? How can anyone decide what is a reasonable limit on the number of free SMSes which can be sent? Why not 1,000? Why should someone set a limit on this at all? Suppose ardent supporters of Anna Hazare (I am not one!) wish to broadcast the latest demonstration he wants to conduct at Jantar Mantar, should they be restricted by a limit on the number of free SMSes they can send?

Lastly, is the convenience of not receiving marketing messages worth this restriction? Is this the only way TRAI can find to prevent marketing communications to consumers? Can marketing companies not give each of their agents 15 SIMs and allow them to send 1,500 SMSes a day? Do all marketing companies only use the facility of free SMSes, and can they not afford to pay for sending SMSes if the government sets a limit on free messaging? The truth is that only cell-phone users will be hurt by this regulation, and in a bad way.

 

Advertisements

4 Responses to “Consumer protection or curb on right to speech and expression?”

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Consumer protection or curb on right to speech and expression? « Feeds « MOMMY BLOGS NETWORK- Mommy Blog Aggregator - September 19, 2011

    […] Article FROM https://polityinindia.wordpress.com/2011/09/19/consumer-protection-or-curb-on-right-to-speech-and-exp… SPONSOR- Christian Games for kids-fun and faith based curriculum GET YOUR FREE PASS […]

    Like

  2. Consumer protection or curb on right to speech and expression … | Telecom Regulation - September 19, 2011

    […] Original post: Consumer protection or curb on right to speech and expression … […]

    Like

  3. Consumer protection or curb on right to speech and expression … | Telecom Regulation - September 19, 2011

    […] Read more from the original source: Consumer protection or curb on right to speech and expression … […]

    Like

  4. Welcome to the surveillance state | Polity in India - India as an evolving polity - June 12, 2013

    […] [12] See posts by this blog’s very own aburman at https://polityinindia.wordpress.com/2013/05/31/defamation-who-should-you-fear-more-big-govt-or-big-corporate/ and https://polityinindia.wordpress.com/2011/09/19/consumer-protection-or-curb-on-right-to-speech-and-exp… […]

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Bar and Bench

Observations on legal and political developments in India

Firstpost

Observations on legal and political developments in India

Mainstream Weekly

Observations on legal and political developments in India

Scholars without Borders

Observations on legal and political developments in India

Legal Blog

Observations on legal and political developments in India

LAW RESOURCE INDIA

LEGAL RESOURCE CENTRE / COURT JUDGMENTS / LEGAL ARCHIVES

India Together

Observations on legal and political developments in India

Concurring Opinions

Observations on legal and political developments in India

Bar & Bench

Observations on legal and political developments in India

Law and Other Things

Observations on legal and political developments in India

sans serif

the news. the views. the juice.

%d bloggers like this: